What Do People See When They Look at Visualizations?

Visualizations, visualizations everywhere, but what do people see when they look at them?

Pie I have eaten

It’s hard to know what people think they see when they look at visualizations. So I propose a session where we look at a bunch of visualizations, especially but not necessarily from history or the humanities, and talk about what we see.┬áThis discussion could include at least three elements. First, perhaps some people in the room will be versed in the science of perception. Second (and more interesting to me, at least) I’d like to see the different scholarly interpretations people make of visualizations. To put the question a different way, if you were going to show a particular visualization to a class or write about it in an article, what arguments would you make? Third, should the conventions (the grammar) of historical and humanities visualizations be different than the visualizations that prevail elsewhere? (Cf. Johanna Drucker’s article.)

If people are interested in this session, perhaps we could prepare for the discussion by posting links to visualizations that we can talk about in the comment section below.

Categories: Digital Literacy, Mapping, Session: Make, Session: Talk, Visualization |

About Lincoln Mullen

Lincoln Mullen is an assistant professor in the Department of History and Art History at George Mason University.

1 Response to What Do People See When They Look at Visualizations?

  1. deb says:

    Goodness Lincoln!
    I’d love to stick around for the saturday sessions just to get a heated debate/discussion going around JD’s position that “the digital humanities can no longer afford to take its tools and methods from disciplines whose fundamental epistemological assumptions are at odds with humanistic method”….

    with an embrace for mixed methods, critical appropriation, tool creation and the collision of art practice and data development!

    yours truly,
    another digidame

Comments are closed.